Obviously, lawsuits of this nature arent actually filed by animals or nonliving things but by people or groups. Daleiden deserves accolades, not a court judgment ordering him to pay $15.8 million to the very people whose horrific treatment of aborted babies he worked to expose. David Perle 202-483-7382. Photographer David Slater has won his legal battle over that monkey selfie. Additionally, the district court awarded PETA $144,000.00 and PAWS $42,000.00 in attorneys' fees pursuant to NRS 18.010 (2) (b), as a sanction against Berosini for filing a frivolous lawsuit. However, the court determined that the state could not legally seize the truck and money because Sergeant Ricard had illegally extended the stop to allow Scooby to sniff the vehicle.[2]. Offended? Our EIN number is 94-2681680. The attorneys general, pro-life groups, and animal rights groups like PETA are right to warn that this horrific verdict will chill undercover journalism. Court Case Against SeaWorld. Why PETA Kills is based on interviews with PETA employees, documents from civil and criminal court cases against PETA, photos of animals killed by PETA, state inspection reports, as well as admissions of killing, and support for killing, by Ingrid Newkirk herself. He enjoys Indian food, board games, and talking ceaselessly about politics, religion, and culture. 2d 1259 (S.D. In ruling against Daleiden, the district court relied extensively on its assertion that the CMP Videos contain no evidence of actual criminal wrongdoing. That not only is incorrect on its own merits but also employs the wrong test. PETA said it will pay the family $49,000 and donate $2,000 to a local SPCA to honour Maya. Koch quickly returned to making tweets about Hofmeyr, who he called Racistboy. The less-than-amused Hofmeyr accused the courts of siding with the comedian and his puppet.[1]. I find that there is a greater validity to the suit as against PETA. Please join us in watching PETA make history in behalf of orcas, and in the meantime, never buy a ticket to SeaWorld or any facility that enslaves animals for profit and pleasure. In turn, people have been sued by animals and nonhuman objects. Thus, while the court alluded to Doughney's First Amendment right to create a parody, it ruled that doing so in the form of a website with a domain name that infringed on the target's trademark was not allowable due to the possible confusion for viewers of the site over its ownership. And it said many pets are brought in by low-income owners who cant afford to care for their elderly or sick animals. manner of its exercise with sufficient clarity" in order to safeguard against arbitrary abuse. However, in 2018, a court stopped PETA from settling the lawsuit because it wanted to pass judgment that would allow judges to decide over similar incidents in the future. WASHINGTON The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and the Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit today seeking to stop the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from unconstitutionally blocking comments containing keywords associated with viewpoints critical of . The agreement was confirmed Wednesday by PETA and the familys attorney. PETA's response is due at the high court April 28. Animal activists filed another lawsuit against the Miami Seaquarium Monday. One of his messages urged Hofmeyrs sponsors to cancel their contracts with the musician. Shelters that call themselves no kill typically will only put down animals with incurable health problems or behaviours that pose a serious safety risk. 15 U.S.C.1114, 15 U.S.C. Gwendolyn Vercher said the lawsuit was outrageous.[4]. 'Monkey selfie' case: Photographer wins two year legal fight against Peta over the image copyright. for a Great Oregon, 515 U.S. 687 (1995) (reasonableness of . Please try again, Zarate had alleged that PETA operates under a broad policy of euthanizing animals, including healthy ones, because it considers pet ownership to be a form of involuntary bondage., PETA denied the allegations and maintains the 2014 incident was a terrible mistake.. Msg/data rates may apply. As my attorney argued. The panel of three judges (Judge Carlos Bea, Judge Randy Smith, and Judge Eduardo Robreno) ruled that not only did PETA lack next friend status to bring the lawsuit on behalf of the monkey, animals in general dont have standing to sue under the Copyright Act. Following the Constitutional Court's rejection of PETA's appeal, PETA brought its case before the ECtHR. But in cyberspace, the letters briefly stood for People Eating Tasty Animals. We wrapped him in my wifes coat and rushed him to the nearest emergency veterinary hospital where he was given the care he needed, including pain medication. The women removed an unattended and unleashed Chihuahua named Maya, which was a Christmas president to 9-year-old Cynthia Zarate. But it also runs a shelter at its headquarters in . Americans United for Life, Live Action,Project Veritas and Project Veritas Action, and Judicial Watchalso filed briefs supporting Daleiden. Shore Transit rejected the advertisements, stating that they were too offensive for the transit systems advertising market and political in nature, in violation of Shore Transits advertising policy. National Meat Ass'n v. Harris, 565 U.S. 452 (2012) (FMIA expressly preempts California state law pertaining to slaughterhouses.) One officer even asked her if she could identify the monkeys in a police lineup.[9]. Discovery sues Paramount in South Park streaming fight. PETA says its euthanasia rate is partly the result of accepting animals that other shelters decline. PETA loses appeal in Bandera Wranglers case. Access all of our expanded, online-only, subscriber exclusive opinion writing. LEXIS 13421, 263 F.3d 359, Using a trademarked name in the URL for an unaffiliated website, even for parody purposes, is a violation of the, 15 U.S.C.1114, 15 U.S.C. Trouble began for Jimmy when Mr. Dillio took him to Ms. Sheas shop. While PETA sued others directly, suing me in such a manner would be dangerous for them. However, we were forbidden any defense based on the truth of what Daleidens investigation uncovered.. If history is any guide, PETA would have injected him with poison instead. PETA has announced that it has settled its copyright lawsuit against photographer David Slater over his iconic "monkey selfie," a self-portrait allegedly taken by a macaque named Naruto. Joined by three orca experts and two former SeaWorld trainers, PETAs lawsuit asserts that the conditions under which these orcas live constitute the very definition of slavery. Regardless, the Ninth Circuit appears to be very, very mad at PETA. He has been a guest speaker on numerous national radio and television stations and is a five time published author. PETA's involvement may seem surprising, but the animal-rights groups rightly warn that the district court's $15.8 million ruling against Daleiden endangers the freedom of speech. filed a lawsuit on behalf of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) against the Tri-County Council for the Lower Eastern Shore of Maryland and its public transit division, Shore Transit. This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. The court ruled that animals cannot file or own copyrights. The monkeys took hundreds of pictures, some of which included Slater. PETA's earliest efforts focused on legal challenges to animal treatment in the U.S., but they have since broadened their mission to include multi-pronged outreach efforts. Filed on August 17, the . The parties in Naruto v. Slater settled last September, but the appellate court refused to grant their joint motion to dismiss, imposing this decision against their respective wills, for no apparent reason other than to repeatedly dunk on People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). She was watching the Barbary macaques when two of them attacked her without warning. In fact, with its numerous references to legitimate children and widows and widowers, it probably only applies to humans. Gwinnet County tried to have the lawsuit dismissed, but a federal judge rejected this, so the county appealed. Shea offered Jimmy a piece of candy, which he accepted while chattering in appreciation. On 10/29/2021 BUREAUS INVESTMENT GROUP PORTFOLIO NO 15 LLC filed a Contract - Debt Collection lawsuit against PETA-GAYE THOMPSON. However, he failed to receive the order when a court determined that Koch and Missing had done nothing wrong and could tweet about Hofmeyr. He has appeared on Fox News' "Tucker Carlson Tonight." However, in making this ruling with respect to . There is an interesting lawsuit filed in Washington against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) over censorship. Apr 24, 2018. PETA, a Norfolk-based non-profit, has . However, he impounded it when Scooby, his police dog, sniffed out 11.9 grams of marijuana hidden inside the vehicle. Instead, Doughney was merely required to surrender the domain name. Eventually, they could be released into the ocean to be reunited with their pods. The information they provided was used to corroborate newspaper articles, on the record sources, government documents received under the Public Records Act, testimony and information from civil and criminal cases against PETA, videotape evidence, and admissions of killing by PETA officials. Judge Flammer threw the case out, saying the that court could not charge monkeys. Over the years, people have sued animals and even inanimate objects like puppets. The Court denied PETAs motion, a victory for animals, investigative journalism, the First Amendment, and breaking ground by extending those protections to new/non-traditional media, such as bloggers. While we still dont know the answer to the last question, the new decision throws some light on the rest of it. Despite stemming from 2011, the case regarding the copyright of a photo technically taken by a monkey is not over yet. Doughney refused to do so, leading to the lawsuit, in which PETA alleged that Doughney committed trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition, and cybersquatting. PETA again apologizes and expresses its regrets to the Zarate family for the loss of their dog Maya, both parties said in a joint statement. On July 6, 2013, a Georgia man named Randall Kevin Jones broke into his exs home and stole several items, including her television, camera, and game console. Meanwhile, Doughney claimed that his website was a parody, which was an act of free speech and which should absolve him of the trademark infringement allegation. v. Sea World Parks & Entertainment Inc., 842 F. Supp. Rolo bit Carr on September 18, 2016, as Carr attended the opening of a store. Court records for this case are available from U.S. Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) claimed that Naruto owned the copyright to the picture. And that is what they did: demanding via subpoena that I reveal the names of PETA employees who spoke to me on condition of anonymity about PETAs killing of animals. The zoo . By order dated May 29, 1996, the district court awarded PETA $228,625.48 and PAWS $6589.91 in costs. The family had sought up to $7 million. Emergency Stay Filed to Try and Save Chimps From PETA's Potentially Deadly Clutches. For whatever reason, you are now asking the question: Why should animals have rights? READ MORE, Ingrid E. Newkirk, PETA President and co-author of Animalkind. ), and zoos while promoting a vegan diet. The lawsuit included various co-conspirators they claimed were involved, including a family they paid $49,000 in a legal settlement after they were caught taking and illegally killing their dog (Maya); the Accomack County Sheriffs Office, which arrested the PETA representatives; the Virginia Attorney Generals Office which launched an animal crimes unit in response to the killing of Maya; and various others, including The No Kill Advocacy Center, my organization, and me, the author of a series of articles about PETAs killing, which culminated in the book, Why PETA Kills. In 2014, PETA was contracted to help remove stray dogs in Eastern Virginia. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is an animal rights organization with an international reach. And I had the facts on my side. Thus, the but-for motivation for the security is the constitutionally protected conduct, and therefore the 9th Circuit should reverse the lower courts ruling. 1125 (a), 15 U.S.C. The court found it unnecessary to review the content of Doughney's site and only considered his use of the domain name. Consistent with overwhelming evidence already available, such testimony would likely be damning, and PETA knows it. Your Crocodile Purse and Snakeskin Boots Have a Disturbing Past, Ugandas First Vegan School Wins PETA Kindness Award, Diane Warren Is Standing With PETA to Help End the Iditarod, And the Winners of PETAs Sixth Annual Oscat Awards Are. PETA is mostly known for campaigns against factory farming and animal testing, often exposing unsavoury practices through undercover operations. A family has settled a lawsuit against People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta) after it took a girl's unattended dog and put it down. Of course, SeaWorld wants the case to be dismissed, but on January 13, our legal team filed a briefopposing SeaWorlds motion, and the case will be argued on February 6, 2012. U.S. only. If you want to learn the how, what, where, when, and why, Why PETA Kills is available for free download on Amazon through Friday. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The Thomas More Society is defending Daleiden in five different legal cases. Afr., Hoho v. S, Case No . Jamie founded Listverse due to an insatiable desire to share fascinating, obscure, and bizarre facts. The court relied on Cliffs Notes, Inc. v. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.[4] to rule that, in order to constitute a parody, the peta.org domain acted as a title that must simultaneously convey that (1) the site was not the official PETA site, and (2) that it was merely a parody. The Animal Legal Defense Fund is rated four-stars by Charity Navigator, is a Platinum Level GuideStar Exchange participant, a Better Business Bureau Accredited Charity, and an Independent Charity Seal of Excellence awardee, ensuring that we meet the highest standards of accountability, efficiency . PETA brought a suit against Slater and a self-publishing book company in 2015, claiming that he had infringed the monkeys copyright by releasing Wildlife Personalities, a self-published book of photography that included the famous monkey selfie. A close-up photo of a Sulawesi crested macaque grinning boldly at the camera went viral on the internet in 2011. The legal outcome ends an attempt to in effect . The puppet in question is Chester Missing, which is owned by South African ventriloquist and comedian Conrad Koch (pictured above with Chester). Carr said the bite scar constantly reminds him of the horrific and unnecessary event.[10]. As many of you already know, in 2017, PETA filed a lawsuit against several reporters and critics of their killing. But in some cases, theyll place animals on waiting lists if they lack space or refer animals to other shelters. Winograd and NKACs intertwined investigative and advocacy work are no different from that done by Nader and his nonprofit Public Citizen. Based on this amendment, PETA's legal team filed a lawsuit that asked a federal court to find that five wild-caught orcasforced to perform at SeaWorldwere being enslaved. Amul is running a 'Myths vs Facts' advertisement, where the company had said that "plant-based beverages are impersonating and . In another key notable brief, the attorneys general of 20 different states Arizona, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia argued that the district courts ruling rests on a crooked foundation. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals should reverse this ruling, or, failing that, the Supreme Court should correct this egregious attack on free speech. PETA also asked the court to grant it custody of the monkeys. SUPREME COURT. The 20-page concurrence was even harder on the animal rights organization, arguing that the majority hadnt gone far enough to stop future litigation by PETA. PETA claimed that the injunction violated its right to freedom of expression, which is protected by Article . 2012)) was a legal case heard in the US Federal Court in 2012 concerning the constitutional standing of an orca.It was brought by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) on behalf of Tilikum, an orca kept in the SeaWorld Orlando park, against the SeaWorld corporation. The District Court ruled against PETA on precisely this ground. Therefore, the lawsuit demonstrated that if people stand up to PETAs donor-funded intimidation tactics, rather than cower to them, PETA will invariably back down. In October 2011, PETA filed a lawsuit against SeaWorld in behalf of five wild-captured orcas seeking a declaration that these five orcas are slaves and subjected to . The public policy defense is applicable to the claims presented, and its appropriateadjudication must assess the substantial law enforcement and policy consequences of the release of the CMP Videos., Multiple congressional bodies, as well as state and local jurisdictions, investigated [Planned Parenthood] and other industry entities after the release of the CMP Videos, the attorneys general wrote. Under Cetacean, monkey can see but monkey cant sue. The circuit court concluded that because the website may have confused users who wanted to buy items from the actual PETA website, it was "connected" to commerce even though Doughney did not sell any goods or services. to experiment on, eat, wear, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way. PETA's lawsuit alleges that the Monterey . From Mortimer Thompsons firsthand accounts of the slave trade leading up to the Civil War, to Nellie Blys graphic translation of her time in Blackwells Island Insane Asylum, to Upton Sinclairs expos of the meat-packing industry, investigative reporting is responsible for bringing to public view some of the most pressing matters in the last 150 years, they argued. On 07/24/2020 PETA filed a Civil Right - State Statute Constitutionality court case against Josh Stein in U.S. Courts Of Appeals. After recuperating at our house, we found him a loving, new home, consistent with our belief in the ethical treatment of animals. PETA also alleged that Doughney's use of its trademarked acronym in the domain name for his website, before they had the chance to do the same, was a violation of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA). Forty years ago I fought for the fundamental right of people to marry the person of their choosing, regardless of race, says Hirschkop. But the shelters euthanasia rate it put down more than 1,400 of about 2,000 animals in 2016 has drawn criticism from some in the so-called no kill shelter movement. When two of the named defendants filed a motion with the court to compel PETA to provide information under oath, PETA, as predicted, cut and run. However, Rolo bit Carr in the abdomen when Carr touched the canines ear and head. 2001), was an important Internet domain trademark infringement decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. She was six weeks pregnant at the time and went ahead with the abortion after he refused. PETA seems to employ Naruto as an unwitting pawn in its ideological goals.. S. [2], The acronym PETA was a registered trademark that belonged to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. A number of animal rights groups including the D.C.-based Humane Society of the United States ended their long-running litigation with Feld Entertainment this week by paying nearly $16 million to . A trial was scheduled for September, during which Zarates attorneys had planned to question current and former PETA employees about its euthanasia policy. In 1995, Michael Doughney registered the domain name peta.org for his website titled "People Eating Tasty Animals". The court also ordered Hofmeyr to pay Koch and Missings attorney fees. So mark your calendars: That day that will go down in history as the first time that a U.S. court considers constitutional rights for animals. I want to thank Joshua Koltun, my attorney and more importantly, warrior for the First Amendment. "PETA was eager to prove in court that chasing and . The organization said it helps as many as 25,000 animals a year, spaying and neutering many for free. The ruling became an early precedent on the nature of domain names as both trademarked intellectual property and free speech. Un Jardin a Cythere is inspired by the Greek island of Kythira. The case worked its way to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, where the court framed the issue this way: . While the following court cases are bizarre, hilarious, or both, they show just how far people will go to get justice. This effectively gave copyright ownership to Slater.[6]. Naruto, a crested macaque monkey in Indonesia, has no rights to the (adorable) selfies he took on a nature photographer's camera, according to the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Standing/Ripeness What followed was a bizarre copyright battle between Slater and the monkey, which was named Naruto. However, a judge threw the case out because horses cannot sue their owners, or anybody for that matter. On November 29, 1877, The New York Times reported that one Ms. Mary Shea lost a lawsuit against Jimmy Dillio, a monkey owned by one Mr. Casslo Dillio. At the bottom of the page, the website inquired "Feeling lost? Although Cetacean had concluded that the worlds whales, porpoises, and dolphins werent allowed to sue under that particular statute, the case says that the US Constitution itself doesnt stop animals from bringing lawsuits. The ruling is a victory for an animal-rights group in one of several legal actions against the zoo owner who appeared in . On Tuesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals threw out a copyright lawsuit brought by a selfie-taking monkey. However, in 2018, a court stopped PETA from . Have a comment? Tilikum v. Sea World (Tilikum et al. Its likely that PETA tried to settle the lawsuit before a decision was reached in order to avoid a ruling that might make it harder for them to bring future lawsuits. Carr sued for $50,000 in damages. The lawsuit was brought by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and the Animal Legal Defense Fund after the Like the undercover work of Upton Sinclair, Daleidens sting videos drew Americans attention to an important truth: the tiny human bodies that are the key byproduct of abortion. While the following court cases are bizarre, hilarious, or both, they show just how far people will go to get justice. Follow him on Twitter at@Tyler2ONeil. Planned Parenthood employees sued and a judge ordered Daleiden to pay them$15.8 million. Also listed as defendants were the company that made the pill used for the abortion, the doctor who did the abortion, and every organization the doctor worked with. Slater insisted that he owned the copyright and not Naruto. Meta backs new tool for removing sexual images of minors posted online, Warner Bros. In 2018, a horse in Oregon sued its owner for neglect. The case was first heard at the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. 4. In a remarkable self-own, this ruling did that and more. Carr met Deputy Bernards and Rolo standing at the entrance of the store. In 2008, photographer David Slater encountered a troop of crested black macaques while taking pictures at an Indonesian wildlife park. In May 2020, PETA submitted two proposed advertisements calling for the closure of slaughterhouses along Marylands Eastern Shore. Immediately, PETA went to a Louisiana court and obtained a temporary restraining order against the procedure. It remains unclear what claims PETA purported to be "settling," since the They are best known for their frequent inflammatory and downright irresponsible media stunts, such as throwing red paint or fake blood on people . First, such costs serve as a stand-in for direct publication damages and could severely limit undercover reporting as a result. In 2018, the state of Kansas lost a lawsuit against a Toyota pickup truck. She was saved when a warden chased the monkeys away. But four important things came out of that victory. A jury found that that breach cost the officer his job . In Cetacean, a self-appointed attorney for all of the worlds whales, porpoises, and dolphins sued the government over the Navys use of sonar. The groups highlighted the importance of undercover reporting. They also know I would never settle, nor agree to a dismissal. But most of all, I want to thank my wife, Jennifer, who reminded me as I faced the specter of incarceration for refusing to allow my informants to be put at risk of retribution by PETA that we all have a duty to honor the sacrifices made by generations before us by likewise defending the freedoms they fought for. That showed three things: they have something to hide; their lawsuit is without merit; and, the lawsuit was filed for purposes of intimidation and harassment in an attempt to silence critics. Tyler O'Neil is an author and conservative commentator. In 2017, Harriss successor, Xavier Becerra (another politicianbankrolled by Planned Parenthood), filed 15 felony charges against CMP and Daleiden. However, Jimmy turned violent and bit Ms. Sheas finger when she playfully attempted to retrieve the candy. Protected sea pens would allow orcas greater freedom of movement as well as the opportunity to see, sense, and communicate with their wild cousins and other ocean animals; to feel the tides and waves; and to engage in the behaviors that theyve long been denied. Zarate acknowledges that this was an unfortunate mistake by PETA and the individuals involved, with no ill-will toward the Zarate family.. [5], This refusal to consider a site's content when determining whether it qualifies as a parody was arguably rejected by the Fourth Circuit in Lamparello v. Falwell (2005), where in discussing PETA v. Doughney, the court wrote, "[t]o determine whether a likelihood of confusion exists, a court should not consider how closely a fragment of a given use duplicates the trademark, but must instead consider whether the use in its entirety creates a likelihood of confusion".[6]. If Planned Parenthood can silence Daleiden, agriculture companies can silence PETA, or so the argument goes. Read more about cookies here. The officers turned down her request because monkeys are wild animals and cannot be charged. 4. The Arizona Attorney General investigated a firm which was a case study in the congressional report for how the fetal tissue transfer industry operates, and the Arizona Legislature ultimately proscribed most fetal tissue transfers.. Hearing the arguments for about an hour, US District Judge Jeffrey Miller raised concerns over whether animals could be represented as plaintiffs in a lawsuit. The Planned Parenthood lawsuit is not the only attack on David Daleiden. Justice was hungry, thirsty, and underweight by 136 kilograms (300 lb) at the time it was rescued. In just one year, PETA rescued 39 tigers from decrepit conditions, and two more, Luna and Remington, went to their new home at an accredited sanctuary this past January. The complaint alleges that Shore Transits policy violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments because it is incapable of reasoned application by Shore Transits officials, viewpoint discriminatory against speech that Shore Transit deems offensive, and inherently vague. They oppose hunting, fishing, animal testing, pets, seeing eye dogs (!!! I refused. The courts found this depiction to be unacceptable under German law, which is constructed around the protection of human dignity. Because of this and the fact that the domain name is identical to the distinctive PETA trademark, the court ruled that Doughney violated the ACPA. The controversy, pitting Doughney against PETA, a Virginia-based nonprofit organization, has snaked its way from the offices of the original domain name registrar, Network Solutions, Inc., to . Noting that David Daleidens abortion sting videos made a big impact on Americas public policy debate would be an understatement. A truck driver who was fined for parking his vehicle in Toowoomba to save it from floodwaters has won a court case against the Toowoomba Regional Council. In 2015, 23-year-old Melissa Hart tried getting a pair of monkeys arrested and charged with sexual assault while he was visiting Gibraltar. There was an error, please provide a valid email address. Magers said he filed the lawsuit because he wants the law to protect fathers of unborn children. This case was the first in history that sought to apply the 13 th Amendment to other animals. He added that the officer told the dog, Eat him up, eat him up., McQuery later claimed he made a mistake by naming the dog as a defendant. On January 17, 2021, the district court issued an order denying Defendants motion to dismiss the case. Did You Ever Wonder How and Why the Left Is Able to Push Their Narratives Almost Unhindered? For obvious reasons, I am glad it was me and not PETA reps who saw him in the gutter on the way to the courthouse. With the evidence of their misdeeds mounting, PETA's spurious lawsuit continued its collapse. It is only by exposing the deadly, gut-wrenching reality about what is happening at PETA that we can ever hope to bring such atrocities against animals to an end. [2] This was soon completed and peta.org now leads to the official website for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The suit alleged PETA has a broad policy of euthanizing animals, including healthy ones, because it considers pet ownership to be a form of involuntary bondage.

Ruppert Plaza Garage Parking Rates, Quincy Police Log, Live Turkeys For Sale In California, Love's Truck Stop Cb Radio Antenna, Yonico Router Bits Feeds And Speeds, Articles C